<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marking Occurrences &#187; Flash Builder Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/category/flash-builder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe</link>
	<description>References and declarations in Flex compiler  development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:25:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>We shipped.  Now what?</title>
		<link>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2010/04/08/we-shipped-now-what/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2010/04/08/we-shipped-now-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zuckerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Extending Flash Builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Builder Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the new version of Flash Builder 4 has been officially released.  It has a number of great new features and it&#8217;s a huge step forward from Flex Builder 3. A new version of the Code Model APIs have also been released.  This is a pretty serious step forward in terms of the API.  In [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2010/04/08/we-shipped-now-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holy Crap!  There&#8217;s a lot of new stuff in Flash Builder&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/06/03/holy-crap-theres-a-lot-of-new-stuff-in-flash-builder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/06/03/holy-crap-theres-a-lot-of-new-stuff-in-flash-builder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 07:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zuckerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eclipse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Builder Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Using Flash Builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seriously, there are so many new features and enhancements in Flash Builder, it would be impossible to mention them all.  Instead, to really get a taste of what&#8217;s new in Flash Builder, you really need to watch the videos.  Since I work on language features (primarily the language model), I was lucky enough to demo [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/06/03/holy-crap-theres-a-lot-of-new-stuff-in-flash-builder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flex Builder&#8217;s wikipedia entry is a little harsh</title>
		<link>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zuckerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flash Builder Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just surfing wikipedia and thought I&#8217;d see what the internets have to say about Flex Builder.  Turns out, we&#8217;ve made someone very, very angry.  They don&#8217;t feel like Flex Builder provides anything beyond code hinting, and provides &#8220;virtually no functionality to write ActionScript/MXML code.&#8221;  Not exactly an unbiased, accurate view of reality. As [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Help us decide where to go with Flex 4</title>
		<link>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/10/help-us-decide-where-to-go-with-flex-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/10/help-us-decide-where-to-go-with-flex-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zuckerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flash Builder Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internally on the Flex team, we&#8217;ve been talking about how to partition the new Flex 4 features within the existing Flex 3 SDK.  Flex 4 introduces new Buttons, CheckBoxes, etc that must live happily with components from Flex 3.  And, Flex 4 also introduces new &#8220;language&#8221; features, like the new states syntax. As an example, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/10/help-us-decide-where-to-go-with-flex-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listen to me rant about ActionScript, part 3</title>
		<link>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/01/26/listen-to-be-rant-about-actionscript-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/01/26/listen-to-be-rant-about-actionscript-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zuckerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ActionScript 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Builder Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ActionScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C++]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hoisting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scopes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So after a three week vacation, I think I&#8217;m finally ready to dive into a few other fun pieces of ActionScript.  And really, what better place to start than local variable hoisting. In Java and C++, local variables are scoped per block, starting at the beginning of a function.  Each set of curly braces corresponds [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/01/26/listen-to-be-rant-about-actionscript-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flex Builder Protip: Import missing imports</title>
		<link>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/18/flex-builder-protip-import-missing-imports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/18/flex-builder-protip-import-missing-imports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zuckerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eclipse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Builder Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Using Flash Builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s say you&#8217;ve just pasted in a snippet of code, or loaded a file that is missing imports.  When you compile, you get errors and you&#8217;re stuck importing each definition by hand.  Flex Builder provides a bit of a hidden feature here to help you import your missing types:  next to each type that is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/18/flex-builder-protip-import-missing-imports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flex Builder Protip: Jump to matching braces</title>
		<link>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/10/flex-builder-protip-jump-to-matching-braces/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/10/flex-builder-protip-jump-to-matching-braces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zuckerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Builder Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Using Flash Builder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A feature forever undocumented in Flex Builder is the ability to jump directly to matching braces.  To use it, simply place your cursor to the left on an { or the right of an } and press Ctrl/Cmd+shift+P.  For the JDT nerds out there, it&#8217;s the same key command.  Enjoy!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/10/flex-builder-protip-jump-to-matching-braces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listen to me rant about ActionScript, part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/08/listen-to-me-rant-about-actionscript-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/08/listen-to-me-rant-about-actionscript-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zuckerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ActionScript 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Builder Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ActionScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C++]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[es4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So we all know people build some amazing things using ActionScript: it&#8217;s a flexible language that provides some syntactic sugar to make developer&#8217;s lives easier. That sugar, however, gives me, umm, toothaches, some of which I talked about already. So now, I&#8217;ll rant about some other idiosyncrasies of AS3 that make it an interesting language [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/08/listen-to-me-rant-about-actionscript-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listen to me rant about ActionScript, part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/04/listen-to-me-rant-about-actionscript-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/04/listen-to-me-rant-about-actionscript-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zuckerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ActionScript 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eclipse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Builder Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ActionScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C++]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e4x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokenize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve been working on a new feature for Flex Builder (Gumbo), and like always I can&#8217;t really tell you what it is yet.  But, I can say it&#8217;s support for a new language feature in ActionScript that rhymes with &#8220;Schmector.&#8221; Reading over the ActionScript grammar reminds me how much I dislike so many syntactic elements in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/12/04/listen-to-me-rant-about-actionscript-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick tour of ASDoc support in Gumbo (Flex Builder 4)</title>
		<link>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/11/21/quick-tour-of-asdoc-support-in-gumbo-flex-builder-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/11/21/quick-tour-of-asdoc-support-in-gumbo-flex-builder-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zuckerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Builder Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Using Flash Builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ActionScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASDoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SWC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SWF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you were lucky enough to be at MAX this year, and even luckier to see the &#8220;Looking ahead to Flex Builder 4&#8243; session, then you saw me demo ASDoc support in the next version of Flex Builder, code-named &#8220;Gumbo&#8221;. For everyone else, this feature is way too cool (and useful) not to know about! [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2008/11/21/quick-tour-of-asdoc-support-in-gumbo-flex-builder-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
