Comments on: Flex Builder’s wikipedia entry is a little harsh http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/ References and declarations in Flex compiler development Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:26:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Kumar Chetan Sharma http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/comment-page-1/#comment-30645 Kumar Chetan Sharma Tue, 07 Apr 2009 06:25:31 +0000 http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=131#comment-30645 I was one of those who tried to learn flex and could not learn and started hating it and even wondered if AS is closely related to JS. Things have changed. I like FB. Code completion is also available in Notepad++ but its debugger, profiler and other features that made me comfortable with FB in just 3 days. Though there are issues like no native support for associative arrays as JS or PHP does. I have spent one complete day banging my haed with array.length and then realise that I was trying to use an array as an hash or map or list or what ever computer science grads call it. :-) I was one of those who tried to learn flex and could not learn and started hating it and even wondered if AS is closely related to JS. Things have changed. I like FB. Code completion is also available in Notepad++ but its debugger, profiler and other features that made me comfortable with FB in just 3 days. Though there are issues like no native support for associative arrays as JS or PHP does. I have spent one complete day banging my haed with array.length and then realise that I was trying to use an array as an hash or map or list or what ever computer science grads call it. :-)

]]> By: Jon Toland http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/comment-page-1/#comment-30165 Jon Toland Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:47:29 +0000 http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=131#comment-30165 That's outrageous glad someone fixed it. After enjoying the goodness of the JDT I spent a couple years doing PHP/AJAX/etcetera in Aptana which is impressive in its own right but is significantly restricted by its represented languages. Flex Builder 3 has been so refreshing. There are certainly features I miss but then again I don't miss Java that much ;) I look forward to the Enterprise IDE's functionality migrating to Flex Builder 4 great work guys! That’s outrageous glad someone fixed it. After enjoying the goodness of the JDT I spent a couple years doing PHP/AJAX/etcetera in Aptana which is impressive in its own right but is significantly restricted by its represented languages. Flex Builder 3 has been so refreshing. There are certainly features I miss but then again I don’t miss Java that much ;) I look forward to the Enterprise IDE’s functionality migrating to Flex Builder 4 great work guys!

]]> By: localToGlobal » Blog Archive » news review -> 8th week of 2009 http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/comment-page-1/#comment-29221 localToGlobal » Blog Archive » news review -> 8th week of 2009 Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:39:19 +0000 http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=131#comment-29221 [...] > Marking Occurrences » Flex Builder’s wikipedia entry is a little harsh [...] [...] > Marking Occurrences » Flex Builder’s wikipedia entry is a little harsh [...]

]]> By: David Zuckerman http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/comment-page-1/#comment-29153 David Zuckerman Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:17:17 +0000 http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=131#comment-29153 Yep, edited for neutrality but not accuracy. Yep, edited for neutrality but not accuracy.

]]> By: Ryan Phelan http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/comment-page-1/#comment-29140 Ryan Phelan Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:00:50 +0000 http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=131#comment-29140 You got me curious enough to browse through the article's revision history. The version you saw was after somebody edited it for neutrality... check out the original version (posted by an anonymous person of course): http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adobe_Flex_Builder&oldid=260866033 You got me curious enough to browse through the article’s revision history. The version you saw was after somebody edited it for neutrality… check out the original version (posted by an anonymous person of course): http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adobe_Flex_Builder&oldid=260866033

]]> By: berryblitz http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/comment-page-1/#comment-29047 berryblitz Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:38:41 +0000 http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=131#comment-29047 I guess there are lots of developers who tried to learn flex. But unfortunately, they failed, or something like stuck to something and then gave up. Those people might hate flex. I guess there are lots of developers who tried to learn flex. But unfortunately, they failed, or something like stuck to something and then gave up.

Those people might hate flex.

]]> By: David Zuckerman http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/comment-page-1/#comment-29037 David Zuckerman Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:55:11 +0000 http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=131#comment-29037 that's fantastic! I love the internet that’s fantastic! I love the internet

]]> By: Adobe Flex Tutorial http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/comment-page-1/#comment-29036 Adobe Flex Tutorial Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:33:37 +0000 http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=131#comment-29036 Few month ago, the wikipedia page about Adobe Flex in French was only talking about Flex before version 2, when it was still a server-side tech and you had to pay a licence per cpu, how sad is that :P. I updated that so now it tells the truth :) But well, you made me realise that there is absolutely nothing about FB in french on WP, i'll try to update that some day (would be easier if more content was added in english already ^^) :P Few month ago, the wikipedia page about Adobe Flex in French was only talking about Flex before version 2, when it was still a server-side tech and you had to pay a licence per cpu, how sad is that :P . I updated that so now it tells the truth :)
But well, you made me realise that there is absolutely nothing about FB in french on WP, i’ll try to update that some day (would be easier if more content was added in english already ^^) :P

]]> By: David Zuckerman http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/comment-page-1/#comment-29034 David Zuckerman Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:51:56 +0000 http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=131#comment-29034 Yep, the internet is magic :) Yep, the internet is magic :)

]]> By: Erich Cervantez http://www.markingoccurrences.com/adobe/2009/02/18/flex-builders-wikipedia-entry-is-a-little-harsh/comment-page-1/#comment-29028 Erich Cervantez Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:46:09 +0000 http://davidzuckerman.com/adobe/?p=131#comment-29028 Hmm, it looks like someone has updated it as I don't see any of the text you mentioned. Good! Hmm, it looks like someone has updated it as I don’t see any of the text you mentioned. Good!

]]>